Tom Hall, Senior Agronomist, Rooster Strategic Solutions
Rooster is following issues that threaten production agriculture, ranking them from 1 (Low Danger) to 5 (Extreme Danger).
The threat from herbicide-resistant weeds is maintained at Level 5 because these weeds are difficult and expensive to control and can be devastating to yield and profitability if not managed correctly. Adding a degree of difficulty to controlling glyphosate-resistant pigweeds is that the primary post control chemicals – dicamba, 2,4-D, and glufosinate – are all at least 50 years old with no new post-control chemistries in sight.
There is some good news for soybean growers: Bayer’s XtendFlex® soybean technology, which resists both dicamba and glufosinate, gained final European Union export approval. Soybean farmers now have a new tool, but the downside is that as more acres are treated with glufosinate, the chance of weeds becoming resistant to this family of chemistry increases.
It is also encouraging that Bayer and BASF are still fighting for dicamba technology. Both companies say they made progress in their formulations to reduce off-target movement, also known as volatility. U.S. EPA Adminstrator Andrew Wheeler said he was not prepared to comment on new registration for dicamba other than that his agency is still reviewing the new data submitted for the less-volatile dicamba formulations. Stay tuned.
Working against the chance for new dicamba registrations such as Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® soybeans are the 915 damage complaints received in 2020 by state departments of agriculture in the 20 largest soybean producing states. Iowa led the way with 257 complaints. That’s the most dicamba complaints received by the state since the release of Xtend soybeans. There is a very active community of university weed scientists who do not believe the benefits from dicamba soybeans outweigh the off-target movement risks. This lack of cohesion among industry experts may in the end be what prevents the new dicamba formulations from being registered in 2021. Wheeler said that a final decision about Xtend technology will be finalized in October.
Simply put, for farmers who have resistant weeds, there is no silver bullet. But the steps for control are the same for Xtend, EnlistTM, or LibertyLink® systems:
- Start with clean fields.
- Use a preplant burndown if pigweeds have emerged.
- Apply overlapping residuals with first application at or just before planting followed by a second residual in 21 days.
- Post-spray escape flushes when weeds are less than 4 inches tall.
- If all else fails, consider hiring a hoe crew to clean up fields before the weeds go to seed.
Other imminent threats we’re following:
Animal Ag and Nutrient Management: Level 3 – Considerable Danger
Biomass Legislation: Level 4 – High Danger
Crop Protection Products: Level 3 – Considerable Danger
Loss of bipartisan cooperation on ag issues: Level 2 – Moderate Danger
New alternative fuels: Level 1 – Low Danger
We raised the threat level because of developments in the Chesapeake Bay Region. The EPA is being sued by the states of Maryland and Virginia, as well as an environmental group, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Their aim? To force the EPA to require New York and Pennsylvania to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen runoff from farm fields, factories, and sewage treatment plants.
Here’s the back story: The states that surround the Chesapeake Bay and the EPA formed a compact to reduce pollution in the Bay. Each state agreed as part of the compact to create a blueprint to reduce pollution from point and nonpoint sources. Point source pollution comes from sources like factories and sewage treatment plants; Nonpoint source pollution is the runoff from farm fields, as well as parking lots and lawns. The states used authority delegated to them from the EPA under the Clean Water Act to set a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for both point and nonpoint source pollution – this TMDL is the total amount of pollution that a body of water can receive and still be used for drinking water and recreation.
In 2010 the American Farm Bureau Federation filed suit in federal court to stop the implementation of the state blueprints. Farm Bureau argued that the EPA and states did not have the authority under the Clean Water Act to set a TMDL that includes nonpoint source (farm) pollution. The Farm Bureau suit went from the Federal District Court to the DC Circuit Court, and finally to the U.S. Supreme Court, who sent it back to the DC Circuit Court. The Circuit Court then ruled that the state TMDL blueprints were legal because the Clean Water Act requires a reduction of pollution and the states found that this remedy must include nonpoint source to meet their clean water goals.
After the court ruled in favor of the state blueprints, Maryland and Virginia both met their cleanup goals. They did this by investing in sewage treatment plants, reducing storm runoff, and implementing stricter regulation of animal agriculture. Maryland also started regulating lawn and farm applications. To date, Pennsylvania and New York have not met their goals; the lawsuit filed by Maryland and Virginia against the EPA would require EPA to take actions that ensure Pennsylvania and New York meet pollution reduction goals by 2025.
The Chesapeake Bay is important test case for future pollution regulation for three reasons.
- It provides a game plan to clean up large water bodies like the Great Lakes and Gulf of Mexico
- It shows that the EPA has the authority to bring states together under the Clean Water Act
- Individual states after setting goals must take actions to reduce both point and nonpoint (farm) source pollution.
Ethanol, which uses a third of the corn produced by U.S. growers, is fighting an increasingly dangerous, two-front war. On one side are gasoline refiners pleading for EPA waivers to avoid having to blend ethanol with gasoline. On the other side are well-funded environmental lobbyists who have decided that, when it comes to clean energy, solar and wind projects are preferable to biomass or nuclear. Being squeezed between the two sides of this vise isn’t a new situation for growers. Farmers will need to pay special attention to energy policy as it’s debated in the new 2021 Congress.
For more than 100 years, the U.S. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) has successfully enforced both the safe use of and access to crop protection products. But a new proposal championed by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO) would overhaul FIFRA. Called the “Protect America’s Children from Toxic Pesticides Act of 2020,” the proposal would impose a long list of new restrictions on the regulation, sale, and use of pesticides. It would immediately ban organophosphates and neonicotinoids. It would create a process for citizens to petition the EPA to review and ban pesticides. It would give states a much greater role in regulating farm products. And it would require the EPA to review – and likely restrict – any substances deemed unsafe by the European Union or Canada. Most political insiders believe this legislation has no chance of passing in 2020, but farmers are well advised to watch closely the makeup and actions of the 2021 Congress.
For years ag issues have been overseen by the House and Senate Ag Committees with strong bipartisan support. As Ag issues overlap into health and the environment, they will be overseen by a larger segment of Congress. The legislators with the closest relationship to farmers will have a smaller role in overseeing farmer issues.
Everyone in commodity crop agriculture should look at the Nikola Motor Company. This start-up company is developing hydrogen fuel cells and electric trucks. What differentiates them from Tesla is the development of H2 Filling Stations where they expect to profit primarily as a hydrogen fuel supplier. It is early days for Nikola but biofuels like ethanol and bio diesel have a growing list of competitors.
As conditions change, we’ll do our best to alert you on these issues and tell you if they’re moving up or down the “danger list.”
For now, we recommend:
- Joining an organization like Farm Bureau or other Ag livestock for commodity organizations will help you see what is coming and how they can plan accordingly.
- Lend your voice to shape legislation, both in writing and by attending public hearings.
- Take action to stay in front the situation. For example, every livestock farm should implement a nutrient management plant with the guidance of local soil and water associations or the NRCS.